The "BTU" story, as narrated by the principals (owners), in the Affidavits section.

One question to ask after reading these affidavits, why does a $1 billion venture capital fund (see postings below and comments elsewhere in this blog) need "loans" from one of its founding members, funded from a "consulting" agreement [see 1st Al-Mazeedi Affidavit, Paragraphs 27(a), 28, and 31(c-d)] and channeled through an offshore bank account in Monaco [see 3rd Al-Mazeedi Affidavit, Paragraph 13], to meet payroll or keep other BTU-affiliated companies (some of them US-based ) from "liquidation?"

Evolvence and the Hayat Litigation - consequential contradictions in Wael Al-Mazeedi's statements and actions - re: Mr. Khaled Al Muhairy

An interesting dichotomy is seemingly at work regarding the impetus for Wael Al-Mazeedi's actions vis-à-vis the litigation with Abdulmohsen Hayat. At the very least, some interesting questions are raised by statements and disclosures made in the various documents discussed below.